Noozhawk10%

Judge to Decide on New Trial for Former UCSB Student Convicted of Rape 9%

By Rebecca Caraway11%

8/1/2026, 7:55:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 266 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (26,826 of 29,339 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the article peer group.

Six months after a former UC Santa Barbara student was convicted of sexually assaulting two women and attempted to flee from Sheriff’s Office custody , a judge will decide if he gets a new trial on Thursday. 
Arian Eteghaei, 23, was convicted in January of sexual penetration with a foreign object and domestic-violence battery against an ex-girlfriend, identified in court as Jane Doe H.O.C.; and forcible rape against a woman identified as Jane Doe M.E. 
He also now faces a felony charge of escape by force or violence after he fled from the Figueroa Courthouse following his conviction. 
He has pleaded not guilty to the escape charge . 
Since his conviction, Eteghaei has retained new attorneys and is seeking a retrial. 
Judge Von Deroian will consider the motion on Thursday. 
Eteghaei’s mother, Mitra Zade, remains banned from the courthouse after she yelled at prosecutors and investigators from across the street, and accused the court of corruption following the guilty verdict. 
She will be allowed to watch the tentative sentencing hearing scheduled for Aug. 10 on Zoom, Deroian ruled earlier this week. 
Eteghaei, who was a freshman at UCSB in 2020-21, was arrested and criminally charged in August 2021 for alleged assaults on three women. 
During the investigation, three more women came forward and reported they had been assaulted by Eteghaei, according to authorities. 
Each alleged victim was identified anonymously as Jane Doe plus initials. 
Many of them testified against him in court during the trial . 
Eteghaei also testified in his own defense. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.5%Rebecca Caraway: 0.5%Noozhawk: 1.4%Confirmation Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.8%Noozhawk: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Rebecca Caraway: 1.6%Noozhawk: 1.7%Availability Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 2.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Rebecca Caraway: 0.6%Noozhawk: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.6%Noozhawk: 0.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%Rebecca Caraway: 7.5%Noozhawk: 2.4%Negativity Bias22.9%This article: 2.6%Rebecca Caraway: 0.3%Noozhawk: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 1.8%Noozhawk: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.5%Noozhawk: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 2.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 1.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 1.0%Noozhawk: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 3.8%Noozhawk: 1.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 2.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 2.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Caraway: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

266 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers14%attributed speech229writer words
Selected voice

Arian Eteghaei

100%flagged-word coverage
7 attributed words19% of attributed speech46% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.