Mashable77%

NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for August 1, 2026 12%

7/31/2026, 7:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Bandwagon, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 537 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (27,160 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the article peer group.

The NYT Connections puzzle today is not too difficult if you're a baker. 
Connections is the one of the most popular New York Times word games that's captured the public's attention. 
The game is all about finding the "common threads between words." 
And just like Wordle , Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier-so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle. 
If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for today's Connections solution. 
But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you. 
Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable 
What is Connections? 
The NYT 's latest daily word game has become a social media hit. 
The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications' Games section. 
Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common. 
Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. 
These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. 
Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer. 
If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. 
Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake-players get up to four mistakes until the game ends. 
Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. 
Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. 
Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media. 
NYT Pips hints, answers for August 1, 2026 
Here's a hint for today's Connections categories 
Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? 
Then give these a try: 
Yellow: Hit the sack 
Green: Iconic movie stars 
Meet The Mashable 101: Our list of the content creators shaping the internet today 
Here are today's Connections categories 
Need a little extra help? 
Today's connections fall into the following categories: 
Green: Oscar-winning actors since 2010 
Blue: Perform some hole-machining operations 
Purple: Starting with bread shapes 
Looking for Wordle today? 
Here's the answer to today's Wordle. 
Ready for the answers? 
This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions. 
The solution to today's Connections #1147 is... 
What is the answer to Connections today 
Bedding: COMFORTER, SHAM, SHEET, THROW 
Oscar-winning actors since 2010: BALE, JORDAN, PHOENIX, WALTZ 
Perform some hole-machining operations: BORE, COUNTERSINK, DRILL, REAM 
Starting with bread shapes: BOULEVARD, BUNDLE, LOAFER, ROLLS-ROYCE 
NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for August 1, 2026 
Are you also playing NYT Strands? 
Get all the Strands hints you need for today's puzzle. 
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! 
Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more. 
Not the day you're after? 
Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Mashable: 2.6%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Mashable: 4.6%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 4.1%Mashable: 1.2%Loss Aversion4.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Mashable: 3.5%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 4.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Mashable: 0.5%In-Group Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Mashable: 3.3%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Mashable: 2.7%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.8%Mashable: 1.0%Bandwagon4.8%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Mashable: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 8.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Mashable: 14.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.8%

537 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.5%attributed speech513writer words
Selected voice

Mashable

100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words100% of attributed speech40% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +90.3 ptsWriter: 9.7%Mashable: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.