Mashable77%

Emmy Rossum and Elizabeth Meriwether weigh in on 'Furious's taboo but tender crime tale 34%

By Kristy Puchko52%

7/31/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 74.2% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 342 faulty-reasoning hits from 186 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (17,954 of 27,141 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the article peer group.

This week saw the launch of Furious, a new crime drama from Elizabeth Meriwether (New Girl and Dying for Sex) that focuses on the cat-and-mouse tale of traumatized FBI agent Alice Black (Emmy Rossum), who's tracking a female serial killer (Lola Petticrew) on a deadly quest for vengeance. 
In my review of the series, I cheered Meriwether's masterful blend of dark subject matter with resilient humor. 
In particular, I praised the way she managed to make a show that addresses child trafficking and sexual assault without making a spectacle of either. 
SEE ALSO: 
How 'Furious' delves into a world of sex and violence without being exploitative 
In interviews with Meriwether, Rossum, and Petticrew, we dug in on how the show's creator approached these issues, how her stars tackled their trickiest scenes, and more. 
For more on Furious, check back with Mashable each week. 
We'll have posts and interview snippets dropping all season long. 
The first three episodes of Furious are now streaming on Hulu, with new episodes every Monday through Aug. 
31. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 2.6%Mashable: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.7%Mashable: 1.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 2.3%Mashable: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.5%Mashable: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.2%Mashable: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.1%Mashable: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 53.8%Kristy Puchko: 3.7%Mashable: 4.7%Framing Effect53.8%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 1.1%Mashable: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.9%Mashable: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 1.7%Mashable: 3.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 2.4%Mashable: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 12.4%Mashable: 4.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 2.0%Mashable: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.2%Mashable: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 2.0%Mashable: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.4%Mashable: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Kristy Puchko: 5.7%Mashable: 3.3%Halo Effect9.7%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.1%Mashable: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.7%Mashable: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 2.1%Mashable: 2.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.9%Mashable: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.3%Mashable: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 4.7%Mashable: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 1.0%Mashable: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.8%Kristy Puchko: 4.3%Mashable: 2.8%Appeal to Emotion25.8%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 1.4%Mashable: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.2%Mashable: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.2%Mashable: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 1.1%Mashable: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.3%Mashable: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.9%Mashable: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.5%Mashable: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.2%Mashable: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.2%Mashable: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 74.2%Kristy Puchko: 16.3%Mashable: 8.6%Biased Writer Voice74.2%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.5%Mashable: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristy Puchko: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.4%Kristy Puchko: 3.3%Mashable: 15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.4%

186 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.