Noozhawk⁠7%

DanceĀ MarathonĀ StepsĀ OntoĀ FloorĀ toĀ SupportĀ Kids’Ā Health ⁠13%

By McCabe Christian⁠17%

8/3/2026, 5:01:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 186 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,326 of 27,739 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the article peer group.

ItĀ seemsĀ studentsĀ atĀ UCĀ SantaĀ BarbaraĀ hadĀ longĀ forgottenĀ aboutĀ theĀ Children’sĀ MiracleĀ NetworkĀ fundraiserĀ DanceĀ Marathon — lastĀ hostedĀ inĀ 2018.Ā 
ThatĀ wasĀ untilĀ aĀ groupĀ ofĀ studentsĀ decidedĀ toĀ reviveĀ theĀ eventĀ andĀ bringĀ itĀ backĀ toĀ campusĀ thisĀ yearĀ withĀ aĀ goalĀ ofĀ raisingĀ $20,000Ā toĀ createĀ aĀ lastingĀ impactĀ inĀ theĀ livesĀ ofĀ localĀ childrenĀ andĀ families,Ā organizersĀ said.Ā 
SpearheadedĀ byĀ UCSBĀ seniorĀ McCabeĀ ChristianĀ withĀ theĀ helpĀ ofĀ MarisaĀ Little,Ā HarperĀ Hohman,Ā andĀ CaitlinĀ Peck,Ā year-longĀ fundraiserĀ hasĀ startedĀ andĀ theĀ DanceĀ MarathonĀ isĀ expectedĀ toĀ takeĀ placeĀ inĀ April.Ā 
TheĀ searchĀ forĀ communityĀ engagementĀ acrossĀ performers,Ā fundraisers,Ā andĀ localĀ businessesĀ isĀ inĀ progressĀ inĀ anĀ effortĀ toĀ drawĀ forĀ children’sĀ health.Ā 
TheĀ DanceĀ MarathonĀ consistsĀ ofĀ fourĀ hoursĀ ofĀ activities,Ā includingĀ performancesĀ fromĀ universityĀ andĀ K-12Ā students,Ā fundraisingĀ pushes,Ā andĀ anĀ openĀ danceĀ floor.Ā 
ThroughoutĀ theĀ schoolĀ year,Ā theĀ DanceĀ MarathonĀ teamĀ plansĀ toĀ holdĀ interestĀ meetings,Ā outreachĀ events,Ā andĀ visitsĀ toĀ localĀ organizationsĀ toĀ talkĀ aboutĀ fundraisingĀ strategies.Ā 
FreeĀ admissionĀ andĀ volunteerĀ opportunitiesĀ willĀ beĀ availableĀ atĀ DanceĀ Marathon.Ā 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 1.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%McCabe Christian: 3.1%Noozhawk: 1.8%Availability Heuristic12.4%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%McCabe Christian: 3.0%Noozhawk: 2.4%Framing Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.0%McCabe Christian: 11.0%Noozhawk: 3.9%Optimism Bias22.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 3.1%Noozhawk: 2.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 3.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 1.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 3.1%Noozhawk: 1.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%McCabe Christian: 0.0%Noozhawk: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

186 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.