Man in yellow van arrested after allegedly shooting at car in S.F. 16%

By Lucy Hodgman21%

7/30/2026, 6:11:49 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 474 faulty-reasoning hits from 242 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of 16% (24,392 of 28,846 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the article peer group.

A man was arrested in San Francisco last week after he allegedly shot through the window of a woman’s car in broad daylight, then sped recklessly away, police said Thursday. 
On June 23, a woman reported that her “car window was just shot out” near the intersection of Steiner and Bush streets in Lower Pacific Heights, the San Francisco Police Department said in a statement. 
The suspect vehicle was hard to miss  a video taken by the victim showed a lemon yellow van with opaque windows and also captured the driver’s license plate number. 
Police said they used a drone and the city’s network of automatic license plate readers to find the van parked in a nearby lot. 
When a man matching the description of the shooter walked toward the vehicle, officers arrested him without incident, police said. 
Police also found ammunition inside the vehicle, as well as a handgun in a nearby storage bin, authorities said. 
Police did not disclose when the shooting was first reported, but the suspect was apprehended just after noon, according to time stamps on body-camera video released by SFPD. 
The man was booked into San Francisco County Jail on suspicion of attempted murder, assault with a semiautomatic firearm, carrying a concealed firearm and willful discharge of a firearm into an occupied vehicle. 
His name was withheld “due to the active investigation,” police said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%Lucy Hodgman: 1.7%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.2%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 1.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Lucy Hodgman: 2.4%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.6%Availability Heuristic12.4%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 11.6%Lucy Hodgman: 0.4%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.4%Hindsight Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.6%Lucy Hodgman: 3.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 3.9%Framing Effect18.6%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.5%Lucy Hodgman: 1.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 1.6%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.9%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 38.8%Lucy Hodgman: 3.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 5.0%Negativity Bias38.8%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.6%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Lucy Hodgman: 0.9%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error12.4%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.2%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.4%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 2.2%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.6%Lucy Hodgman: 0.9%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.8%Recency Bias11.6%This article: 12.4%Lucy Hodgman: 0.2%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.3%Primacy Effect12.4%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.9%Lucy Hodgman: 2.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 3.3%Appeal to Authority9.9%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 2.8%San Francisco Chronicle: 3.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 13.6%Lucy Hodgman: 0.2%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.3%Bandwagon13.6%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 1.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.4%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 1.4%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 1.6%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.3%Lucy Hodgman: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.3%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.5%Lucy Hodgman: 0.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Special Pleading4.5%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.5%Lucy Hodgman: 0.5%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.8%Unattributed Quote14.5%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 1.9%San Francisco Chronicle: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 14.5%Lucy Hodgman: 0.5%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%Indoctrination14.5%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucy Hodgman: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

242 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.