2 Las Vegas men face up to 5 years in prison, accused of aiming laser pointer at police helicopter 2%

By Trevor Squire30%

8/3/2026, 5:15:19 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 33 faulty-reasoning hits from 198 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (25,792 of 26,303 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the article peer group.

Two Las Vegas men in separate cases were indicted on charges for aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft. 
The Department of Justice said in a release that James Bodie Moore III and Jason Lamars Lee both appeared in court Monday and face up to five years in prison if convicted. 
Moore is accused of aiming a beam of a laser pointer multiples at and in the flight path of a Metropolitan Police Department helicopter on April 10, the release said. 
Lee faces similiar accusations of aiming the beam of a laser pointer “two times” at and in the flight path of a Metro helicopter on June 7. 
Both men have jury trials scheduled for September. 
Under the “FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012,” pointing a laser at an aircraft is a federal crime. 
Another Las Vegas man was sent to prison for nine months for pointing a laser at a police helicopter last Wednesday. 
The Federal Aviation Administration said pilots reported 10,993 laser strikes in 2025. 
Contact Trevor Squire at tsquire@reviewjournal.com. 
Follow him at @trevordsquire on X. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 2.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 1.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Trevor Squire: 3.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.0%Availability Heuristic6.1%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 6.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 4.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 3.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 2.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 7.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 5.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Trevor Squire: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Recency Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 2.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 1.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 1.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 3.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.9%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 1.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 7.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Trevor Squire: 4.9%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

198 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers22%attributed speech154writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
12 attributed words27% of attributed speech14% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.