Camden County bridge closes for 3 months to undergo repairs 23%

By Kristin Hunt30%

8/3/2026, 2:14:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 275 faulty-reasoning hits from 211 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (20,689 of 26,881 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the article peer group.

Traffic in Camden County will be disrupted for roughly three months as work begins on Collings Avenue Bridge. 
Beginning Tuesday, the steel structure will close for extensive repairs and refurbishments. 
Vehicles traveling toward the bridge, which crosses over Newton Creek at the edge of Gloucester and Camden, will be diverted to I-676 via Broadway and Morgan Boulevard. 
MORE: Philly's parallel parking contest will showcase drivers' skills. 
Its organizers hope it also spurs better etiquette 
The $2.5 million project will give Collings Avenue Bridge a new concrete deck, parapet and sidewalks. 
Crews will also renovate the support beams and bearings. 
"These improvements to the Collings Avenue Bridge are essential to keeping our infrastructure safe and reliable,” said Al Dyer, Camden County commissioner and liaison to the Department of Public Works. 
"We want to thank our residents for their patience during the next few months and recommend that they give themselves extra time in their commute while detours are in place." 
The two-lane bridge was built in 1954. 
Previous federal inspections had deemed the deck "fair," indicating minor cracking or section losses. 
Follow Kristin & PhillyVoice on Twitter: @kristin_hunt | @thePhillyVoice 
Like us on Facebook: PhillyVoice 
Have a news tip? 
Let us know. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.2%Kristin Hunt: 1.5%PhillyVoice: 2.0%Confirmation Bias14.2%This article: 3.3%Kristin Hunt: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 0.9%Anchoring Bias3.3%This article: 6.6%Kristin Hunt: 1.8%PhillyVoice: 2.5%Availability Heuristic6.6%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.6%PhillyVoice: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Kristin Hunt: 0.3%PhillyVoice: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 5.0%PhillyVoice: 3.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 14.2%Kristin Hunt: 0.6%PhillyVoice: 0.5%Loss Aversion14.2%This article: 7.6%Kristin Hunt: 0.5%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Status Quo Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.0%Kristin Hunt: 2.9%PhillyVoice: 4.1%Optimism Bias19.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.4%PhillyVoice: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Kristin Hunt: 6.6%PhillyVoice: 5.1%Negativity Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 4.4%PhillyVoice: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.1%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Kristin Hunt: 0.6%PhillyVoice: 0.6%In-Group Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 1.6%PhillyVoice: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.1%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.7%PhillyVoice: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.3%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.2%Kristin Hunt: 2.8%PhillyVoice: 2.5%Appeal to Authority14.2%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Kristin Hunt: 0.7%PhillyVoice: 2.8%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 4.3%Kristin Hunt: 0.9%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Red Herring4.3%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.5%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 3.1%PhillyVoice: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 1.5%PhillyVoice: 1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 1.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.9%PhillyVoice: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 1.2%PhillyVoice: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.9%PhillyVoice: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.2%Kristin Hunt: 2.8%PhillyVoice: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice14.2%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.3%PhillyVoice: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristin Hunt: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Kristin Hunt: 2.3%PhillyVoice: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.0%

211 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker28%attributed speech151writer words
Selected voice

Al Dyer

100%flagged-word coverage
60 attributed words100% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice+50.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Al Dyer: 50.0%50.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.9 ptsWriter: 13.9%Al Dyer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.