Young Boy Draws Reactions After Cursing at Waiter Taking the Table’s Order  ‘Stop Irritating Me’ 33%

By Jennifer68%

7/30/2026, 5:18:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 951 faulty-reasoning hits from 607 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36% and a BS Rank of 33% (17,831 of 26,447 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the article peer group.

A child is going viral online, and not because of an amazing accomplishment or a talent his parents decided to showcase online for the world to see. 
This kid is going viral because of what he apparently said, based on a clip reshared by X user @AmiriKing, to a waiter who was simply standing by trying to do his job and take the table’s order. 
A dad records his son cursing at a waiter at a fine dining establishment. 
I wonder if the waiter is going to start disliking blacks because of the color of their skin -OR- the content of their character. 
Tough call. pic.twitter.com/4rUChaCspL 
- Amiri King (@AmiriKing) July 29, 2026 
Young Boy Cusses at Waiter Trying to Take Food Orders 
In the brief clip, a young boy can be seen sitting at a table at a restaurant, playing on his phone. 
A waiter can be seen standing to his left holding a notepad and pen, apparently to write down what the guests at the table wanted to eat and drink, since nothing appeared to be on the table yet aside from a few menus. 
It sounds like the kid first asks, “What’s that they have?” 
But before the waiter even gets a chance to respond, the boy looks up from his phone and tells him, “Stop f****** irritating me,” followed by a hard stare. 
The waiter looks at the child and then over at someone else nearby out of frame, almost as if he wanted to see if anyone else had heard what was just said to him by a child. 
A man at the table then tells the boy, whose name appears to be Montana, to relax. 
“Montana, calm down bro,” he says. 
Another man can then be heard saying the same thing before the first man tells the waiter, “Don’t mind him,” seemingly trying to brush off what he had just said to him. 
That’s the difference right there. 
My dad would have slapped me so hard and then dragged my ass clear across that restaurant and beat my ass all the way to the car. 
I would have never even thought about being such a disrespectful animal to begin with, tho. 
Trash culture. 
And I… 
- PSW (@PSWLLC1) July 29, 2026 
People immediately took to the comments to share how they felt about the interaction between the boy and the waiter, with one X commenter, writing “Regardless of race that’s rude af, dude’s trying to do his job. 
I’d refuse service to them. 
Gtfoh.” 
Another X user said, “My dad would have slapped me so hard and then dragged my ass clear across that restaurant and beat my ass all the way to the car,” adding they never would have thought about being that “disrespectful.” 
Someone else suggested the clip was an example of “bad parenting,” writing, “How was your kid talking like this to a grown man and you’re stupid ass sitting right there watching?” 
They added, “You better check him before somebody else does.” 
While the people in the clip seemed to disregard what the child said, commenters weren’t so quick to let it go. 
The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify where or when the video was recorded or the circumstances surrounding the interaction shown in the clip. 
Sign up to receive the Daily Dot’s Internet Insider newsletter for urgent news from the frontline of online. 
The post Young Boy Draws Reactions After Cursing at Waiter Taking the Table’s Order  ‘Stop Irritating Me’ appeared first on The Daily Dot . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jennifer: 4.2%dailydot.com: 3.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 3.7%dailydot.com: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 1.1%dailydot.com: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.3%Jennifer: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.3%This article: 6.3%Jennifer: 4.1%dailydot.com: 4.2%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Jennifer: 1.2%dailydot.com: 1.2%Pessimism Bias4.4%This article: 16.3%Jennifer: 8.1%dailydot.com: 7.7%Negativity Bias16.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Jennifer: 3.6%dailydot.com: 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error3.5%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Jennifer: 1.8%dailydot.com: 1.7%Ad Hominem2.6%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.2%dailydot.com: 1.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.0%Jennifer: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.9%False Dilemma4.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.3%Jennifer: 7.5%dailydot.com: 7.8%Hasty Generalization18.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 9.6%Jennifer: 2.5%dailydot.com: 2.0%Bandwagon9.6%This article: 12.2%Jennifer: 7.4%dailydot.com: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion12.2%This article: 0.8%Jennifer: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.8%Begging the Question0.8%This article: 6.3%Jennifer: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.1%Jennifer: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.6%Burden of Proof4.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.1%Jennifer: 5.1%dailydot.com: 6.5%Anecdotal5.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.7%Jennifer: 2.1%dailydot.com: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.7%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.4%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading4.4%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.3%Jennifer: 5.6%dailydot.com: 4.4%Unattributed Quote19.3%This article: 4.8%Jennifer: 3.2%dailydot.com: 2.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.8%This article: 18.0%Jennifer: 4.3%dailydot.com: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice18.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Jennifer: 1.1%dailydot.com: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.0%

607 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers5.1%attributed speech576writer words
Selected voice

The Daily Dot

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words58% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Daily Dot: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-20.3 ptsWriter: 20.3%The Daily Dot: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-18.9 ptsWriter: 18.9%The Daily Dot: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%The Daily Dot: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.