Spain invaded at noon, Africans breaking and entering by midnight ⁠99%

By Olivia Murray⁠97%

7/30/2026, 9:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 89.8% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,430 faulty-reasoning hits from 303 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 99% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (293 of 27,322 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the article peer group.

It took mere hours for them to start sacking civilization. 
Yesterday, in the span of mere hours, more than 60,000 third world foreigners poured into Ceuta, Spain. 
For context, this is an area of just seven square miles, an autonomous Spanish jurisdiction on Morocco's coast-so it is off the mainland, though it's likely only a matter of time before these people are transferred to Europe proper as "refugees" and "asylum seekers," since the leftist prime minister is quite welcoming of these "newcomers." 
For more of an in-depth dive on the situation and the politics, check out a brand new podcast from Andrea Widburg titled, " Spain invaded! 
" at AT's "Watch Now" section. 
It literally looks like Thomas Cole's Destruction , the fourth painting in his "Course of Empire" series. 
Now, I'm not exactly sure what time this all happened yesterday morning/afternoon, but mere hours into the invasion, this is how it was going for the local grocery stores: 
And then, by midnight, the barbarians had commandeered ladders, and were breaking into the locals' homes: 
We always hear from the left how the third-worlders are coming "for a better life," as if that is a reasonable and rational justification to permit total lawlessness and the erasure of borders and national sovereignty. 
But isn't that almost every criminal's motivation? 
Doesn't the rapist often rape because he wants a "better" lay? 
Doesn't the burglar break into your home and take your stuff because it's "better" than what he has? 
Doesn't the pickpocket take your wallet because it'll be "better" to have more money as opposed to less? 
Sure, it's obvious that it's better for them to come to an established and functioning nation (no thanks to them), but it's better for us when they don't. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.2%Olivia Murray: 15.4%American Thinker: 9.7%Confirmation Bias18.2%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Olivia Murray: 4.8%American Thinker: 3.3%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 1.4%American Thinker: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.9%American Thinker: 1.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Olivia Murray: 6.9%American Thinker: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias9.6%This article: 5.6%Olivia Murray: 9.8%American Thinker: 6.3%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 9.2%Olivia Murray: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.5%Loss Aversion9.2%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 1.4%American Thinker: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.0%American Thinker: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.4%Olivia Murray: 2.3%American Thinker: 2.3%Pessimism Bias27.4%This article: 39.3%Olivia Murray: 17.6%American Thinker: 11.8%Negativity Bias39.3%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 2.9%American Thinker: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Olivia Murray: 7.1%American Thinker: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error11.9%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Olivia Murray: 5.0%American Thinker: 3.4%In-Group Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 9.8%American Thinker: 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.5%American Thinker: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 1.3%American Thinker: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Olivia Murray: 0.5%American Thinker: 1.1%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 1.4%American Thinker: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 8.0%American Thinker: 5.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 11.9%Olivia Murray: 6.3%American Thinker: 3.7%Straw Man11.9%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 3.3%American Thinker: 4.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 11.6%Olivia Murray: 6.7%American Thinker: 4.2%False Dilemma11.6%This article: 18.2%Olivia Murray: 5.7%American Thinker: 3.1%Slippery Slope18.2%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 42.6%Olivia Murray: 25.1%American Thinker: 15.2%Hasty Generalization42.6%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 1.7%American Thinker: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.4%Olivia Murray: 11.7%American Thinker: 7.9%Appeal to Emotion27.4%This article: 2.3%Olivia Murray: 3.4%American Thinker: 2.3%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 3.3%Olivia Murray: 2.9%American Thinker: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 2.3%American Thinker: 1.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.7%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 23.8%Olivia Murray: 9.1%American Thinker: 3.3%Anecdotal23.8%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 1.0%American Thinker: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.3%Olivia Murray: 1.8%American Thinker: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 1.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 2.7%American Thinker: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Murray: 3.2%American Thinker: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 89.8%Olivia Murray: 32.6%American Thinker: 20.5%Biased Writer Voice89.8%This article: 21.1%Olivia Murray: 9.9%American Thinker: 5.4%Indoctrination21.1%This article: 18.2%Olivia Murray: 0.7%American Thinker: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias18.2%This article: 35.3%Olivia Murray: 18.1%American Thinker: 13.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias35.3%This article: 10.2%Olivia Murray: 1.4%American Thinker: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.2%

303 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.0%attributed speech297writer words
Selected voice

AT

100%flagged-word coverage
6 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +91.6 ptsWriter: 8.4%AT: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-91.6 ptsWriter: 91.6%AT: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -36.0 ptsWriter: 36.0%AT: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-21.5 ptsWriter: 21.5%AT: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-18.5 ptsWriter: 18.5%AT: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.