Truthout84%

Israel Closes Investigation of 2023 Settler Pogrom Without Charging Perpetrators 44%

By Stephen Prager0%

8/1/2026, 9:30:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 935 faulty-reasoning hits from 697 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (15,424 of 27,279 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the article peer group.

As the Israeli government faces increasing scrutiny for its enabling of settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank, the Israel Defense Forces has reportedly closed an investigation into one of the most brutal assaults documented in recent memory. 
Nobody has been charged. 
Haaretz reported on Friday that the Military Advocate General’s Office has closed its investigation into an incident from October 12, 2023, in which about two dozen armed settlers attacked the village of Wadi as-Seeq, about 10 miles east of Ramallah, where most residents had been driven out by violence by a nearby Israeli outpost. 
Three Palestinian men who’d remained in the village to help evacuate the local Bedouin community were detained by the gang of Israelis, who they said tortured them for hours, stripping them naked, beating them, urinating on them, burning them with cigarettes, and sexually abusing them. 
Several Israeli peace activists also said they were attacked during the incident and corroborated much of the testimony of the Palestinian victims. 
A photo of the three men stripped, bound, and blindfolded quickly made international headlines and drew condemnation from human rights organizations and even some pro-Israel groups like the US-based Israel Policy Forum, which called the reports “sickening and inexcusable.” 
The military prosecutor’s office apparently found it very excusable. 
According to Haaretz: 
The Military Advocate General’s Office decided that the evidence collected did not establish the involvement of specific soldiers to the standard required for criminal prosecution. 
The decision was made even though, following the initial publication, several soldiers who were present at the scene  including the unit’s commander  were dismissed. 
The soldiers were from the IDF Desert Frontier unit, a unit that recruits “hilltop youth,” radical and often violent settler youths from illegal West Bank outposts. 
Some of the victims said that settlers also took part in the assault alongside the soldiers. 
The dismissal of the case comes amid what the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) described as “an unprecedented surge in settler-related violence” this year, particularly this summer. 
June saw a record 460 settler-related attacks, and the trend has continued into July, with 360 documented incidents between July 1-24. 
The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights warned on Wednesday that settler violence was at an “all-time high,” noting that 18 Palestinians have been killed so far this year in incidents linked to settler attacks, more than the 17 who were killed all of last year. 
The Israeli government, meanwhile, approved over $430 million to establish 34 new settlements in the West Bank earlier this year. 
“The increase is part of a broader upward trend in settler violence that has been developing since 2023 but has accelerated significantly in 2026,” said Nasser Khdour, Middle East Assistant Research Manager at ACLED. 
“Recorded incidents include attacks on Palestinians and their property, land seizures, looting activities, uprooting trees, grazing on Palestinian land, and clashes with Palestinians.” 
As The Times of Israel noted on Friday: “Israel has largely failed to crack down on such attacks, with arrests rare, indictments even rarer, and convictions almost unheard of. 
The current government has been accused of turning a blind eye to the phenomenon or even tacitly supporting it.” 
Members of the IDF have often been documented either directly participating in the violence or providing protection to settlers who are. 
Earlier this month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed during a CNN interview that his government was working hard to bring violent settlers to justice and conducting “real investigations.” 
But he also minimized the problem of settler violence that has become rampant, boiling it down to about “150 or so juvenile delinquents” causing mayhem while stating that they don’t represent the broader settler community. 
There have been no reported charges coming from this month’s deadly attacks, which have resulted in the deaths of at least eight Palestinians and many more injuries, according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. 
A Guardian analysis on July 21 found that Israel has not once prosecuted any of its citizens for killing a Palestinian in the West Bank at any point this decade. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.5%Stephen Prager: 3.7%Truthout: 5.4%Confirmation Bias20.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Stephen Prager: 5.6%Truthout: 3.2%Availability Heuristic15.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Stephen Prager: 5.9%Truthout: 9.8%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 7.1%Truthout: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Stephen Prager: 3.0%Truthout: 11.1%Negativity Bias15.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Stephen Prager: 0.4%Truthout: 1.7%In-Group Bias2.7%This article: 3.7%Stephen Prager: 0.5%Truthout: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.1%Stephen Prager: 2.1%Truthout: 1.1%Recency Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.5%Truthout: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 6.3%Stephen Prager: 0.9%Truthout: 0.4%Straw Man6.3%This article: 12.8%Stephen Prager: 2.8%Truthout: 3.3%Appeal to Authority12.8%This article: 2.7%Stephen Prager: 1.0%Truthout: 1.8%False Dilemma2.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 1.6%Truthout: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.5%Truthout: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.6%Stephen Prager: 5.2%Truthout: 6.9%Hasty Generalization16.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.3%Truthout: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 2.0%Truthout: 8.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.6%Stephen Prager: 0.8%Truthout: 1.5%Begging the Question5.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.3%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.4%Truthout: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.9%Truthout: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.2%Stephen Prager: 1.1%Truthout: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 8.3%Stephen Prager: 4.0%Truthout: 8.4%Biased Writer Voice8.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 3.1%Truthout: 2.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.2%Truthout: 6.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Prager: 0.0%Truthout: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

697 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers19%attributed speech567writer words
Selected voice

The Times of Israel

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words37% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Quote-first Misdirection+60.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Times of Israel: 60.4%60.4%Biased Writer Voice-10.2 ptsWriter: 10.2%The Times of Israel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.