The End of the West Near Portland, Oregon 55%

By Paul J. Pastor68%

7/31/2026, 11:45:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Middle Ground, Genetic Fallacy, and Anchoring Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 262 faulty-reasoning hits from 125 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (13,618 of 30,190 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the article peer group.

Nobody knows for sure where the name came from. 
*Oregon*, I mean. 
There are a couple dozen theories. 
Maybe those sounds started as something in one of the many Native languages, or Spanish, or Portuguese, or maybe it was a mistake on a French map. 
Maybe it’s from “Ouragan,” the mythic river of the West, or maybe it’s something about the wind, or the waterfalls, or oregano (yes, the herb), which the conquistadors found in the south as they traveled up the coastline trying to stick flags in stuff. 
Paul J. 
Pastor is executive editor of Nelson Books, a widely published writer, and author of several books, most recently, *The Locust Years: Poems*. 
He lives in Oregon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 3.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 21.6%Paul J. Pastor: 5.4%The Dispatch: 0.6%Anchoring Bias21.6%This article: 4.8%Paul J. Pastor: 10.0%The Dispatch: 1.8%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 1.6%The Dispatch: 4.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Paul J. Pastor: 0.8%The Dispatch: 0.8%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 3.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 5.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Paul J. Pastor: 4.4%The Dispatch: 1.5%Halo Effect17.6%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.9%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.6%Paul J. Pastor: 4.4%The Dispatch: 3.1%Appeal to Authority17.6%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 14.2%The Dispatch: 5.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 35.2%Paul J. Pastor: 8.8%The Dispatch: 0.9%Anecdotal35.2%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 21.6%Paul J. Pastor: 5.4%The Dispatch: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)21.6%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 35.2%Paul J. Pastor: 8.8%The Dispatch: 0.2%Middle Ground35.2%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 35.2%Paul J. Pastor: 8.8%The Dispatch: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy35.2%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 17.6%Paul J. Pastor: 13.2%The Dispatch: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice17.6%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul J. Pastor: 0.0%The Dispatch: 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

125 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker21%attributed speech99writer words
Selected voice

Paul J.

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words100% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice+84.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Paul J.: 84.6%84.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.