OPB14%

Ukraine mourns "collector of souls" Oleksiy Yukov, killed recovering war dead 1%

By Scott Neuman96%

8/8/2026, 11:39:56 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 784 faulty-reasoning hits from 513 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (30,404 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the article peer group.

Oleksiy Yukov, a Ukrainian known as the “collector of souls” for his decades-long work recovering the remains of soldiers and civilians on the frontlines of war, was honored in Kyiv on Saturday after being killed by a landmine during a recovery mission in the eastern Donetsk region. 
Yukov, 40, was killed on Aug. 5 when he stepped on the mine during an effort to exhume a body, according to a social media post by his friend, Serhiy Hnezdilov. 
“This is a great loss for me personally and for the people close to me,” he wrote in a translation published by Kyiv Post. 
“[H]e gave names back to the dead.” 
Thousands of Ukrainians paid their respects to Yukov in an Orthodox Christian service in the capital. 
Before the service in Kyiv, Yukov was mourned and honored in his hometown of Sloviansk in Donetsk province. 
Yukov was known for his tireless efforts to bring closure to the families of those killed in the war. 
In carrying out that task in 2022, he lost an eye and sustained a leg injury in a mine blast, the Associated Press says, but returned to his work even as he was still recovering. 
As a teenager, Yukov became interested in searching for the remains on WWII battlefields in Ukraine, according to Ukrainska Pravda. 
After the Russian invasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014, he founded Platsdarm (“Bridgehead”) to recover remains and provide dignified burials for the dead, the newspaper said. 
Through this work, he became known as a “collector of souls.” 
As part of a profile of Yukov, the newspaper quoted him as saying that he and a small group of Platsdarm volunteers would set off early every morning. 
“If it’s a safe area, we survey the territory with a drone. 
We check trenches, craters, shell holes, belongings, rubbish bins,” he said. 
“Then we divide the area into grids and search for mines and explosive devices using probes and metal detectors. 
We call in bomb disposal experts, who destroy or neutralize them. 
Then we carefully search the area for bodies.” 
Yukov and his team recovered not just Ukrainian soldiers, but Russian soldiers, too, as well as civilians killed as a result of the conflict that has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives on both sides of the fighting. 
Months into the full-scale war that began in Feb. 
2022, Yukov told Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty that Russia “has caused tremendous grief for us.” 
Russia, he said “started a war against us; it is ruining our cities and killing our people. 
But we remain human even in these circumstances and gather their military’s dead bodies.” 
In an International Emmy-award winning documentary about Platsdarm’s work, titled Ukraine’s Frontline Sacrifice, Yukov said that he believes souls are reborn. 
“If the body is not yet buried, the body remains with the soul. 
And until it is mourned, until its loved ones let it go, it cannot be reborn  the soul wanders. 
And the war will not end as long as souls wander.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Scott Neuman: 2.8%Associated Press: 1.1%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.3%Associated Press: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 5.2%Associated Press: 1.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.3%Associated Press: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 3.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.5%Associated Press: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 25.0%Scott Neuman: 8.8%Associated Press: 2.8%Framing Effect25.0%This article: 2.1%Scott Neuman: 2.9%Associated Press: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Scott Neuman: 2.3%Associated Press: 2.0%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 8.4%Scott Neuman: 3.2%Associated Press: 1.7%Pessimism Bias8.4%This article: 18.7%Scott Neuman: 12.8%Associated Press: 4.6%Negativity Bias18.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 4.8%Associated Press: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Scott Neuman: 1.8%Associated Press: 0.7%In-Group Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 21.8%Scott Neuman: 3.5%Associated Press: 0.9%Halo Effect21.8%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.2%Associated Press: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 8.7%Associated Press: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.1%Scott Neuman: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope2.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 4.8%Associated Press: 1.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.1%Scott Neuman: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 16.8%Scott Neuman: 5.1%Associated Press: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion16.8%This article: 8.6%Scott Neuman: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.2%Begging the Question8.6%This article: 3.3%Scott Neuman: 3.4%Associated Press: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.1%Scott Neuman: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature4.1%This article: 7.4%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division7.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 4.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.6%Associated Press: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.3%Associated Press: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.0%Scott Neuman: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.8%Unattributed Quote6.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.8%Associated Press: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.2%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

513 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers66%attributed speech176writer words
Selected voice

Associated Press

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words10% of attributed speech85% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.