OPB18%

‘Nature’s pretty cool’: Local farm winds down Walla Walla sweet onion field as harvest ends 9%

By Erick Bengel9%

8/1/2026, 10:54:10 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 564 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (24,553 of 26,881 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the article peer group.

Another harvest season for Washington’s venerated vegetable  the Walla Walla sweet onion  is at an end. 
Soft and juicy and fragile like a fruit, sweets are as synonymous with the Walla Walla Valley as is wine. 
And they’re federally protected: Only onions grown in the area can officially be sold as a Walla Walla sweet. 
They’re farmed by about a dozen growers in the valley, which straddles southeastern Washington and northeastern Oregon. 
The flavor enriches menus and recipes throughout, and beyond, the Pacific Northwest. 
There’s even an amateur Walla Walla baseball team called the Sweets. 
On a Wednesday morning in late July, farmer Tom Williams, 79, drove his Toyota Tacoma out to his seven-acre sweet field in Umatilla County, Oregon. 
There, a few workers crouched to pick the transplant onions; these were imported from Arizona as starts and planted in April. 
In another area, the onions grown from seeds planted in September had all been harvested. 
Rows of burlap sacks held freshly gathered onions, which spend a week drying out, toughening up. 
Then the cured onions are taken in bins to the processing facility at the main farm, across the state line into Washington, where they’re chilled, stored, loaded into cardboard boxes and shipped. 
Williams and his brother, Ray Williams, 75, are third-generation farmers who own Williams Organic Farms, a roughly 1,800-acre operation that grows Walla Walla sweet onions, squash, wheat, rye, barley, pinto beans and wine grapes. 
They started growing the sweets just a few years ago. 
This year, they estimate they’ll ship about 100,000 pounds of sweets to destinations that include Spokane, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles and British Columbia. 
“The most fun thing is when you plant a crop, and it actually grows, and you harvest it  it’s almost a surprise to me when that happens,” Tom said with a laugh. 
He added: “Nature’s pretty cool.” 
The Williams’ workers began harvesting the last week of June. 
It usually takes them about five weeks. 
Pepé Carrillo, who oversees the farm’s onions and other crops, said he’d recently started showing up around 5 a.m.  for a while, it was 4 a.m.  to finish the field work while the temperature was still forgiving. 
Carrillo was watering the soil where the fall-planted onions had been. 
His goal: to germinate the weed seeds that are left behind  weeds grow up with the onions  so they can be removed. 
That way, his crew will have fewer to pull later. 
The process obviates the need for chemicals. 
In a couple of weeks, the crew will plant a cover crop, most likely oats or barley, to keep the soil fertile and further suppress the weeds. 
Next year, the field will support a different crop; the onions will be rotated elsewhere. 
Tom said, “This is a fundamental organic maxim: You can’t beat nature, so don’t fight nature; you have to live with nature  that’s it.” 
Erick Bengel is a reporter with Northwest Public Broadcasting. 
This story comes to you from the Northwest News Network, a collaboration between public media organizations in Oregon and Washington. 
It is part of OPB’s broader effort to ensure that everyone in our region has access to quality journalism that informs, entertains and enriches their lives. 
To learn more, visit our journalism partnerships page. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.2%Erick Bengel: 0.3%Associated Press: 1.1%Confirmation Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Erick Bengel: 2.3%Associated Press: 1.9%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Erick Bengel: 0.7%Associated Press: 3.2%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.4%Erick Bengel: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%Erick Bengel: 3.9%Associated Press: 2.5%Optimism Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 4.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Erick Bengel: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.0%Halo Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.4%Erick Bengel: 0.8%Associated Press: 2.1%Appeal to Authority3.4%This article: 4.8%Erick Bengel: 1.2%Associated Press: 0.7%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.1%Erick Bengel: 0.5%Associated Press: 1.7%Hasty Generalization2.1%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.7%Erick Bengel: 0.7%Associated Press: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion2.7%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.4%Erick Bengel: 4.4%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature4.4%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.9%Erick Bengel: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.2%Erick Bengel: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Special Pleading1.2%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 4.3%Associated Press: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erick Bengel: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Erick Bengel: 1.9%Associated Press: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

564 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers30%attributed speech394writer words
Selected voice

Tom Williams

92%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words37% of attributed speech25% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Tom Williams: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.