Colorado School of Mines lands major share in Trump’s $100M mining-education plan 65%

By Thelma Grimes73%

8/7/2026, 4:47:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 625 faulty-reasoning hits from 323 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.5% and a BS Rank of 65% (10,925 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump on Friday named the Colorado School of Mines among roughly a dozen institutions that will share in a $100 million commitment “to train the next generation of American miners.” 
Paul Johnson, the university’s president, said he is “doing the happy dance” after learning the administration planned to invest millions not only in revitalizing the mining industry but also in supporting engineering schools. 
“Half of our current mining workforce is set to retire within the next three years,” Trump said at a roundtable discussion in Washington, D.C. 
“The schools came to us seeking $10 million per year in funding. 
Instead, I’m thrilled to announce that we’re delivering $100 million to train the next generation of American miners.” 
Johnson thanked Trump and said the funding would significantly strengthen the mining community. 
He noted that, while mining programs nationwide have shrunk, they have grown in Colorado over the past two years  growth he attributed to the administration’s support. 
The university added that the investment will help the Colorado School of Mines build a 50,000-square-foot facility focused on advancing technology, speeding ideas into pilot programs and moving innovations toward commercialization. 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum joined the discussion. 
Rubio called the investment essential, saying mining is “a domain that goes to the very survival of the country” and argued the U.S. has fallen decades behind. 
Trump’s announcement, he said, will help reverse that trend. 
In addition to funding for mining schools, Trump said more than $2 billion in funding will go toward critical mining and mining-related projects aimed at revitalizing the industry. 
“The mining industry has never had a greater champion than President Trump,” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement. 
“His unprecedented support has driven record investment, streamlined permitting and delivered real results for American workers, companies and communities.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.4%Thelma Grimes: 7.2%Denver Gazette: 2.4%Confirmation Bias20.4%This article: 3.7%Thelma Grimes: 1.9%Denver Gazette: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 21.7%Thelma Grimes: 7.3%Denver Gazette: 1.6%Availability Heuristic21.7%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 2.6%Denver Gazette: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Thelma Grimes: 5.9%Denver Gazette: 4.6%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 32.5%Thelma Grimes: 19.8%Denver Gazette: 3.5%Optimism Bias32.5%This article: 7.4%Thelma Grimes: 1.9%Denver Gazette: 1.9%Pessimism Bias7.4%This article: 8.4%Thelma Grimes: 4.2%Denver Gazette: 4.9%Negativity Bias8.4%This article: 11.5%Thelma Grimes: 5.0%Denver Gazette: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias11.5%This article: 8.4%Thelma Grimes: 2.1%Denver Gazette: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error8.4%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.1%Thelma Grimes: 8.7%Denver Gazette: 2.3%Halo Effect16.1%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 5.6%Denver Gazette: 1.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%Thelma Grimes: 5.1%Denver Gazette: 3.9%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.4%Thelma Grimes: 6.3%Denver Gazette: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion8.4%This article: 8.4%Thelma Grimes: 2.1%Denver Gazette: 0.6%Begging the Question8.4%This article: 17.0%Thelma Grimes: 7.8%Denver Gazette: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.2%Thelma Grimes: 2.6%Denver Gazette: 1.1%Unattributed Quote10.2%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.3%Thelma Grimes: 3.9%Denver Gazette: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice9.3%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 3.1%Denver Gazette: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thelma Grimes: 0.0%Denver Gazette: 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

323 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers81%attributed speech61writer words
Selected voice

Marco Rubio

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words10% of attributed speech20% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.7 ptsWriter: 19.7%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.