Tax increase, cash reserves will cover new expenses in 2027 Great Falls budget 10%

By Matt Hudson6%

8/5/2026, 12:44:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anchoring Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 542 faulty-reasoning hits from 911 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (27,732 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the article peer group.

The Great Falls City Commission Tuesday passed a $169 million budget for 2027 and gave initial approval to property tax increases of about $61 on a $600,000 home. 
The budget includes plans to use $631,732 in general fund reserves to cover expenses, an annual practice that has diminished those reserves in recent years. 
And while not all budget requests made it into the 2027 document, city commissioners and the mayor will receive pay increases in a process that one commissioner decried as opaque. 
The 6.59% property tax increase will amount to $1.4 million for the city’s general fund. 
Montana law allows cities to pass limited increases without voter approval to reflect inflation and health insurance costs. 
About $820,000 of the increase is explicitly reserved for staff health insurance. 
Two residents spoke at the public hearing Tuesday night against the tax increases. 
City leaders pointed to increased expenses, primarily from labor costs resulting from union contracts. 
Salary and benefit costs are expected to increase by nearly $4.3 million across all city departments in 2027. 
The sharpest increases are in departments covered by the property tax-supported general fund, which covers city administration and park and recreation, as well as public safety departments like fire, police and courts. 
“It would be really nice to say no more taxes,” Commissioner Rick Tryon said after the public comments. 
“But in reality, and being responsible, we can’t do that.” 
Not all budget requests were granted. 
City documents show several requests for fire and police personnel and equipment that weren’t granted in the 2027 budget. 
A request for an additional $100,000 to support the Scheels Aim High Big Sky recreation center was denied, though the facility was already slated for a $400,000 infusion from the city’s general fund. 
Several lifeguard and instructor requests for Aim High Big Sky were also denied. 
The city has also faced challenges on the revenue side. 
The three-year Calumet property tax protest deducted six-figure sums from the city’s general fund after the case was settled last year, and new laws from the 2025 Montana Legislature changed how cities and counties raise property tax revenue. 
On one hand, the city can take a larger inflationary increase. 
The law used to limit those increases to half the average inflation for the past three years. 
The ceiling is now the full average of inflation over three years  2.87% for the coming budget. 
But revenue from new development, called newly taxable property, was muted by new legislation. 
City Finance Director Melissa Kinzler told commissioners that her staff is still requesting information from the Montana Department of Revenue, which sets property values each year. 
While the department is working under a new system, the early indication is that the city’s projection of $300,000 in newly taxable property revenue might not have been conservative enough. 
“A preliminary review of what we’re looking at with the DOR, we may be a little bit short,” Kinzler said. 
The overall picture for taxpayers is an expected property tax increase of $61.21 on a $600,000 home, or $28.84 on a $300,000 home. 
While Tuesday’s resolution approved the proposed budget, the city will hold a dedicated public hearing on the property tax increase Aug. 
18. 
Separately, the city commission will consider proposed increases to special district assessments and utility fees for water, sewer, stormwater and trash services. 
Each of those proposals will be considered at future commission meetings. 
As part of Tuesday’s budget approval, the city commission passed increases to their annual stipend. 
The increases nearly triple the annual stipend for the mayor and more than double that for the four city commissioners. 
The current annual stipend for the mayor is $2,100. 
That will increase to $6,000 for the year. 
City commissioners also currently receive a $2,100 annual stipend, and the 2027 increase will bring it to $4,700. 
The stipends are in addition to annual base salaries of $5,616 for the mayor and $3,714 for each commissioner. 
City officials noted that the stipends hadn’t been updated since 1989. 
At Tuesday’s meeting, Commissioner Joe McKenney made a motion to break out the commission stipend for a separate vote and public discussion at a later date. 
Commissioner Casey Schreiner supported the motion, but it failed on a 2-3 vote, with Commissioners Tryon and Shannon Wilson, as well as Mayor Cory Reeves, against. 
McKenney acknowledged that brief comments had been made in the past about increasing commission pay, but those discussions never reached a clear public forum. 
“I was not aware that those informal discussions had progressed to a formal proposal,” McKenney said at the meeting. 
A line item for the stipend increase was included in a supplementary budget document , but it only noted the added cost and didn’t specify the size of the increase relative to the current amount. 
Aside from a few comments, commission pay wasn’t discussed in detail at public meetings and wasn’t fully laid out in budget documents. 
The Electric reported that much of the stipend discussion took place in emails among commissioners and city staff over multiple years. 
“We’ve discussed this several times at work sessions and amongst ourselves,” Reeves said at Tuesday’s meeting. 
As a result of the stipend debate, the budget resolution passed on a 3-2 vote with Commissioners Schreiner and McKenney against. 
The post Tax increase, cash reserves will cover new expenses in 2027 Great Falls budget appeared first on Montana Free Press . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.8%Matt Hudson: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.8%Confirmation Bias1.8%This article: 4.5%Matt Hudson: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 0.8%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 1.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.3%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Matt Hudson: 0.3%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 7.0%Matt Hudson: 3.0%Montana Free Press: 2.5%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.2%Matt Hudson: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Status Quo Bias1.2%This article: 2.7%Matt Hudson: 0.3%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 1.1%Montana Free Press: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Matt Hudson: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.7%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 4.2%Matt Hudson: 1.3%Montana Free Press: 2.0%Negativity Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 1.6%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Matt Hudson: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Matt Hudson: 0.3%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Recency Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Matt Hudson: 0.4%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.0%Matt Hudson: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 1.1%Appeal to Authority2.0%This article: 1.1%Matt Hudson: 0.4%Montana Free Press: 0.7%False Dilemma1.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 1.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 1.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 1.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.2%Matt Hudson: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.3%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.3%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.1%Matt Hudson: 1.1%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.9%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.3%Matt Hudson: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 5.7%Matt Hudson: 1.1%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Biased Writer Voice5.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Hudson: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

911 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers20%attributed speech731writer words
Selected voice

The Electric

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words12% of attributed speech47% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Electric: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%The Electric: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.