Big Sonic Heaven: New shoegaze, classic shoegaze—we have it all! ⁠2%

By Darren Revell⁠1%

8/3/2026, 12:02:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 215 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (29,987 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the article peer group.

Tonight we heard the brand-new single from Blonde Redhead and a track from the new Starflyer59 EP. 
Plus, some dreamy new music from Locust & Olive Kimoto, and more, along with your favorite shoegaze, dreampop, and post-punk classics. 
Big Sonic Heaven playlist for Aug. 
2, 2026 
“The Garden Ends” – The Autumns 
“Mon Amour Sauvage” – Dead Can Dance 
“Blood Spilled” – Blonde Redhead 
“Crank” – Catherine Wheel 
“I Wanna Disappear” – Starflyer 59 
“The Sweetness Of Honey” – Club 8 
“Eighties Fan” – Camera Obscura 
“Lions & Tigers” – Asobi Seksu 
“Coming Home” – The Haunted Youth 
“From The Edge Of The Deep Green Sea” – The Cure 
“The Visitors” – Doublespeak 
“New Dress” – Depeche Mode 
“Recollection” – Keep Shelly In Athens 
“swim” – Night Tapes 
“Unicorn” – Bel Canto 
“White Light” – Locust & Olive Kimoto 
“Jellyfish” – Left at Orion 
“Pearl” – Chapterhouse 
“Without you (feat. 
Soccer Mommy)” – Winter 
“2 Wicky” – Hooverphonic 
“Octopus” – Starrgazy 
“A Return” – The Tear Garden 
“Orange Appled” – Cocteau Twins 
“Aurora” – Attic Ocean 
“Someone’s Calling” – Modern English “Northern Sky (w/ Anne Garner)” – Stefano Guzzetti 
“Mr. 
Somewhere/Andialu” – This Mortal Coil 
“Ophelia” – Johnny Marr 
“Chained to a cloud” – Slowdive 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 1.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 1.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Darren Revell: 3.6%WDET: 3.4%Framing Effect14.4%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Darren Revell: 1.2%WDET: 2.4%Optimism Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 2.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Darren Revell: 2.4%WDET: 3.4%Halo Effect9.8%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Darren Revell: 2.0%WDET: 0.6%Recency Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 1.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 2.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 3.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Revell: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Darren Revell: 4.8%WDET: 5.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.4%

215 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.