VTDigger44%

Why Vermonters won’t call Fish and Wildlife about bears 65%

By Mike Fry76%

8/2/2026, 7:40:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 358 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52% and a BS Rank of 65% (9,745 of 27,309 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the article peer group.

A recent article in VTDigger provided good information about human encounters with bears. 
Mostly, though, it focused on comments by staff at the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department complaining that people do not call them when they encounter bears. 
In the article, it seems no one understands why people do not call the department when a bear gets into their garbage. 
Ironically, a letter published in VTDigger in May has already explained why, with supporting data. 
Walter Medwid provided data from an America’s Wildlife Values study, supported by the U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service and led by Colorado State University, that surveyed Vermonters, with a separate survey of Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department staff. 
These surveys showed the department and many Vermonters appear to be on opposite sides of core values. 
They think the department supports special interests like hunters more than it supports ordinary Vermonters. 
The department bemoans the fact that people do not call them whenever a bear takes a birdfeeder. 
They ask people to report complaints. 
But when people do, the department uses those complaints to say that there are growing problems with bears, which it then uses to loosen the rules for killing them. 
Some neighbors say they have regular encounters with bears taking garbage or birdfeeders, and they do not see it as a problem. 
They are not going to report it to the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department because they think the department is not on their side. 
The article said that 99% of the time when someone calls the department, killing the bear is not the first response. 
Sure. 
But it is an option chosen far too quickly, meaning bears are suffering because of human behavior. 
That is why people don’t want to call the department to report what are effectively non-issues with bears. 
The killing of bears for simply acting like bears when people do irresponsible things, like not securing food, houses, cars and garbage, shows why Vermonters are right not to trust the system. 
Read the story on VTDigger here: Why Vermonters won’t call Fish and Wildlife about bears . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.1%Mike Fry: 10.3%VTDigger: 2.0%Confirmation Bias22.1%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 2.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.7%Mike Fry: 1.2%VTDigger: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Mike Fry: 1.7%VTDigger: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias6.7%This article: 2.5%Mike Fry: 2.5%VTDigger: 3.8%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 5.0%Mike Fry: 1.3%VTDigger: 0.8%Loss Aversion5.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 2.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.4%Mike Fry: 5.1%VTDigger: 1.6%Pessimism Bias20.4%This article: 39.4%Mike Fry: 12.2%VTDigger: 4.3%Negativity Bias39.4%This article: 17.0%Mike Fry: 4.3%VTDigger: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias17.0%This article: 6.1%Mike Fry: 3.8%VTDigger: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error6.1%This article: 4.7%Mike Fry: 1.2%VTDigger: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias4.7%This article: 10.9%Mike Fry: 9.0%VTDigger: 1.1%In-Group Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 1.7%VTDigger: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Mike Fry: 1.5%VTDigger: 0.6%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 10.3%Mike Fry: 2.6%VTDigger: 0.2%Primacy Effect10.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.6%Mike Fry: 2.7%VTDigger: 2.0%Appeal to Authority10.6%This article: 13.1%Mike Fry: 5.5%VTDigger: 1.6%False Dilemma13.1%This article: 8.1%Mike Fry: 4.1%VTDigger: 0.7%Slippery Slope8.1%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 2.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.4%Mike Fry: 7.7%VTDigger: 3.2%Hasty Generalization15.4%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.7%Mike Fry: 7.8%VTDigger: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion4.7%This article: 17.0%Mike Fry: 4.3%VTDigger: 0.6%Begging the Question17.0%This article: 12.8%Mike Fry: 3.2%VTDigger: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.8%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.3%Mike Fry: 4.6%VTDigger: 2.0%Anecdotal12.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.7%Mike Fry: 3.4%VTDigger: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.7%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 6.7%Mike Fry: 1.7%VTDigger: 0.1%Personal Incredulity6.7%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.4%Mike Fry: 3.4%VTDigger: 0.8%Unattributed Quote13.4%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.3%Mike Fry: 12.7%VTDigger: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice7.3%This article: 8.9%Mike Fry: 4.5%VTDigger: 1.7%Indoctrination8.9%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Fry: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

358 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers24%attributed speech271writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words28% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Indoctrination-11.8 ptsWriter: 11.8%Colorado State University: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%Colorado State University: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Colorado State University: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.