How A Cheyenne Man Trademarked The Famous Hollywood Sign Because He Was In Love 22%

By Renée Jean13%

8/2/2026, 11:02:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,457 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (23,859 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the article peer group.

CHEYENNE  Every guy, at some point in his life, will say just about anything to get a girl. 
Hit by a bolt from the blue, who can blame them? 
Before they know it, the boldest of promises are tumbling from their lips. 
For Cheyenne native George Jay Wienbarg III, that moment of lovestruck convergence hit him one winter day at New York’s Central Park. 
“She was a very clever Korean girl who was wearing these really interesting clothes,” Wienbarg told Cowboy State Daily. 
“She had made the clothes, and I got to talking to her  she was this very cute, little 5-foot-tall Korean girl  and the clothes were so fascinating, so interesting.” 
As was the girl. 
Wienbarg was so taken by her, the next thing he knew he was telling her that if she could raise $50,000, he knew he could make her and her clothing line Hollywood famous. 
“I knew I could do it, because I’d already done it once,” Wienbarg said. 
“And I had confidence because when I got to New York I had just $35 in my pocket, and in three days I had a job doing the morning show at this country western station in New York City.” 
Not Just Whistling Dixie 
As bold as his promise seemed, Wienbarg’s confidence wasn’t totally misplaced. 
Just before coming to New York to study at the American Academy of Dramatic Arts, he had engineered an international publicity campaign to help his friend Hank Berger sell pieces of the original, world-famous Hollywood sign as souvenirs. 
The sign was an icon. 
Originally built in 1923 to promote a posh little subdivision, the “Hollywoodland” sign stood five stories tall and stretched over a city block, making it the biggest sign in the world at that time. 
The sign was lit up at night with 4,000 20-watt bulbs placed 8 inches apart, and could be seen from at least 50 miles away. 
It required a full-time maintenance man just to take care of replacing burnt-out bulbs. 
In 1949, a new letter “H” was erected for the sign. 
The last four letters, L-A-N-D, were removed, making the sign just “Hollywood.” 
Over the years, pranksters reworked those letters to variations like “Hollyweed"  fun and games. 
Not so fun, however, were the depressed starlets, including Peg Entwistle, who jumped from the letter “H” to their deaths. 
By 1978, time and the elements had taken a toll. 
The sign had become a wreck. 
“It was starting to fall down and it was just thin, rusty old metal on telephone poles,” Wienbarg said. 
“So they said, ‘Well it’s so famous, we better build a new one.’” 
Berger bought the old sign for $10,000 and then called the best marketing person he knew to help him sell off pieces of the sign. 
That was Wienbarg, fresh off a stint as news director in Cleveland, where he’d led his team to the No. 1 station in the market. 
His success there had led him to consulting work in other locations across America, including New Orleans and Raleigh, North Carolina. 
The Dishwashing Segue Way 
Wienbarg had grown tired of news media, though, so when Berger called he was working at the Plains Hotel as a dishwasher. 
Selling the world-famous Hollywood sign sounded a little more interesting, so Wienbarg was in. 
First they cut up squares from the Hollywood sign in Berger’s backyard and then they set each square into a beautiful Art Deco lithograph, with the story of the Hollywood sign underneath. 
They took their collectible to a big gift show in New York, to see if it would catch fire as the status gift of 1980. 
The sales didn’t go well  but not for lack of publicity. 
Wienbarg put together a campaign that sent the story around the globe. 
There were articles in Germany, Spain, and England, as well as in dozens of American newspapers and magazines, from the Los Angeles Times and Cosmopolitan, to People and Time. 
Working on the Hollywood sign helped Wienbarg realize that a dish-washing job in Wyoming wasn’t going to cut it. 
He was bored already. 
So he auditioned successfully for a spot with the American Academy of Dramatic Arts in New York. 
He packed up his life and moved away on July 4, 1981. 
Necessity Is The Mother Of Inspiration 
Six years later, he met Park on that winter day in New York, and made a promise he knew he had to keep, if he wanted to keep his girlfriend. 
“I started selling her clothes,” he said. 
“I just took her under my wing, and she actually became my girlfriend and her dad came up with the 50,000 bucks so I thought, ‘Well, I better figure out some way to make her famous.’” 
Naturally, wrestling with how to do that turned his thoughts to his successful Hollywood sign campaign. 
“So it just occurred to me, trademark the Hollywood sign,” Wienbarg said. 
“I just said, ‘This sign is up there on the hill, it’s in the public domain, nobody’s ever trademarked it.” 
Wienbarg found a clever New York attorney to help him trademark the sign for Park’s clothing line, and then they were in business. 
Wienbarg soon had articles appearing in places such as Variety, the Los Angeles Times, and many others, delivering on his promise in a big way. 
“This is the most familiar trademark next to Coca-Cola,” Wienbarg is quoted in one article as vice president of sales and marketing for Viola Park Fashion, with a projection of $5 million in wholesale volume in the first year. 
“We started making clothes and we found this really cool fabric,” Wienbarg said, holding up a little black dress that he has kept as a memento from the line. 
“It was a rayon and nylon on a warp knit.” 
The fabric feels silky soft and catches silvery highlights here and there in the right light. 
“There were many pieces in this line, and we sold them in Macy’s in every state,” Wienbarg said. 
“What we would do is go to the boutique show four times a year at the Jacob Javits Convention Center.” 
Stores would come from around the world to place orders. 
“We cut to order, so we didn’t make them and then try to sell them,” Wienbarg said. 
“We made them to order.” 
Hollywood Pushback 
What Wienbarg didn’t realize was that trademarking the Hollywood sign would eventually put him at odds with Hollywood itself. 
“Nobody had ever trademarked the Hollywood sign before,” Wienbarg said. 
“So I thought it was just a brilliant idea.” 
But while he and Park were trying to build the Viola Park Fashion line, Hollywood was taking note of the commercial power of its own skyline. 
Articles with headlines like “Controversy surrounds Hollywood sign” started showing up in newspapers with a Los Angeles dateline. 
“People think they own the rights to everything,” one businessman fumed. 
“If the name of the city isn’t in the public domain, what is? 
Next thing you know, the state of California is going to charge royalties for using the name California on shirts.” 
In the wake of Wienbarg’s trademark, the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce spent $25,000 in legal fees to obtain trademark protection for some of its most famous attractions, including the Hollywood Christmas Parade and the Hollywood Walk of Fame. 
Wienbarg ultimately agreed to let the Chamber have the trademark for the sign and license it back from them. 
In exchange, Wienbarg received permission to use names of stars from the Hollywood Walk of Fame like Frank Sinatra, Johnny Travolta, and Bette Davis to promote his clothing line. 
Fame Is Fleeting  Sometimes, So Is Love 
The line seemed to be set for takeoff, but behind the scenes, the dream was fraying. 
Viola’s brother became involved in the business and things began to change. 
“We ended up breaking up,” Wienbarg said. 
“And then I thought, well, I’ll try to come up with a line myself, and I thought this was pretty ...“ 
Wienbarg held up a sleeveless, velvet dress with a pastel floral print. 
“But I never sold them,” he said, adding, “Fame is fleeting.” 
And sometimes love is, too. 
Wienbarg would stay in New York for another 45 years after that, with a successful radio career and eventually a new wife, as well as a fun side gig managing opera singers, and then a few movies to boot. 
These days, he’s back in Cheyenne working on a true crime thriller, and thinking about whether he should relicense the Hollywood trademark for a line of jams and jellies  a story for another day. 
Renée Jean<!-- --> can be reached at<!-- --> renee@cowboystatedaily.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.9%Renée Jean: 0.8%Cowboy State Daily: 2.1%Confirmation Bias1.9%This article: 0.7%Renée Jean: 0.5%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.7%This article: 4.7%Renée Jean: 1.9%Cowboy State Daily: 1.9%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.9%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.4%Renée Jean: 0.7%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Hindsight Bias3.4%This article: 1.0%Renée Jean: 2.3%Cowboy State Daily: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias1.0%This article: 1.4%Renée Jean: 0.9%Cowboy State Daily: 2.1%Framing Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Renée Jean: 2.1%Cowboy State Daily: 1.5%Optimism Bias6.6%This article: 3.0%Renée Jean: 0.4%Cowboy State Daily: 1.0%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 2.1%Renée Jean: 1.3%Cowboy State Daily: 2.6%Negativity Bias2.1%This article: 4.7%Renée Jean: 1.2%Cowboy State Daily: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias4.7%This article: 1.3%Renée Jean: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error1.3%This article: 1.1%Renée Jean: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Renée Jean: 2.1%Cowboy State Daily: 1.7%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Renée Jean: 0.4%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 1.7%Renée Jean: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.7%Renée Jean: 1.6%Cowboy State Daily: 2.0%Appeal to Authority2.7%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 1.4%Renée Jean: 0.6%Cowboy State Daily: 1.0%Slippery Slope1.4%This article: 0.8%Renée Jean: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.8%This article: 2.2%Renée Jean: 3.3%Cowboy State Daily: 2.4%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 1.2%Renée Jean: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Red Herring1.2%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.7%Cowboy State Daily: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%Renée Jean: 1.0%Cowboy State Daily: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 1.4%Renée Jean: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 8.0%Renée Jean: 1.5%Cowboy State Daily: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.6%Renée Jean: 3.1%Cowboy State Daily: 1.8%Anecdotal1.6%This article: 1.4%Renée Jean: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%No True Scotsman1.4%This article: 0.9%Renée Jean: 0.7%Cowboy State Daily: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.9%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 2.3%Renée Jean: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Personal Incredulity2.3%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.3%Renée Jean: 0.6%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Unattributed Quote1.3%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.6%Cowboy State Daily: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Renée Jean: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Renée Jean: 2.9%Cowboy State Daily: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.6%

1457 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker26%attributed speech1,078writer words
77%flagged-word coverage
379 attributed words100% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +16.3 ptsWriter: 10.4%George Jay Wienbarg III: 26.6%26.6%Unattributed Quote+5.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%George Jay Wienbarg III: 5.0%5.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.