Five things to know as data centers spread across rural America 31%

By Juan Vassallo42% Investigate Midwest29%

7/27/2026, 11:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 703 faulty-reasoning hits from 617 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.9% and a BS Rank of 31% (18,643 of 26,881 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the article peer group.

Longhorn cattle at Grande Horn Ranch near Interstate 40. 
The tree line in the background marks the site of the proposed Beltline Energy data center on Saturday, June 27, 2026. photo by Juan Vassallo, Investigate Midwest 
1. 
They use enormous amounts of water 
Data centers, which store and process the digital information needed for everyday online activities, often consume large amounts of water to keep servers cool  especially the new hyperscale facilities typically built for artificial intelligence. 
Google’s data center in Pryor, Oklahoma  one of the company’s largest facilities  uses about 1.1 billion gallons of water each year. 
That is equal to about 8.3 billion water bottles or the annual water use of 10,000 average American households. 
The Pryor data center uses an evaporative cooling system, so most of the water used for cooling is lost to evaporation. 
Of the 1.1 billion gallons of water used, only about 275 million gallons of drinking water are discharged back into the river for reuse. 
The industry is feeling the pressure to move away from that technology, and some new facilities are looking to install closed-loop systems, which recycle water in a continuous cycle, or air-cooled systems. 
These systems use little water but require much more electricity. 
2. 
Researchers know little about water pollution 
Not much is known about how water discharge from data centers impacts the environment. 
A recent study on the issue notes that “there is a clear lack of transparency in data center cooling water discharge practices.” 
Companies often do not disclose how much water they release, where it goes, or what chemicals or pollutants it may contain. 
The study found that cooling water discharges could affect rivers, groundwater and wastewater systems, but limited data makes those impacts difficult to measure. 
Data Center Cooling Water Discharge Download 
3. 
Rezoning battles are becoming more common 
Opposition to data centers has grown out of a broader movement against large industrial projects in rural areas, particularly renewable energy projects . 
Residents in some communities have organized to stop projects they believe provide few benefits to local residents while replacing farmland with industrial buildings, changing the rural landscape. 
One of the main tools communities use to challenge these projects is pressuring local governments to reject rezoning requests that change land from agricultural to industrial use. 
In many cases, those efforts have succeeded . 
The Beltline data center project in Yukon and Oklahoma City, for example, still needs approval to rezone agricultural land in the Oklahoma City portion of the project for light industrial use. 
4. 
Most projects are planned for rural areas 
More than 1,500 data centers are planned across the country, according to the Pew Research Center . 
While 87% of existing U.S. data centers are in urban areas, two-thirds of planned facilities are slated for rural communities. 
In a survey of 1,000 U.S adults, rural residents expressed the highest average level of concern overall. 
Their greatest concern was rising electricity costs, followed by the use of agricultural land for data centers and overuse of water. 
5. 
AI is expanding faster than regulations 
Since 2013, the technology industry has invested more than $1.6 trillion in artificial intelligence. 
In many cases, companies have relied on regulatory gaps or avoided traditional permitting requirements to speed up construction. 
In Oklahoma, data centers do not need to apply for water permits because they typically buy water from municipal utilities. 
In Memphis, Tennessee, Elon Musk’s xAI installed nearly 20 natural gas turbines to power a data center without first obtaining air permits. 
The post Five things to know as data centers spread across rural America appeared first on Investigate Midwest . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.1%Investigate Midwest: 0.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Juan Vassallo: 0.9%Investigate Midwest: 2.0%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 5.3%Juan Vassallo: 2.3%Investigate Midwest: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.3%This article: 6.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.6%Investigate Midwest: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Juan Vassallo: 5.6%Investigate Midwest: 3.6%Framing Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Juan Vassallo: 0.6%Investigate Midwest: 0.3%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Juan Vassallo: 14.1%Investigate Midwest: 9.5%Negativity Bias14.6%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Juan Vassallo: 0.4%Investigate Midwest: 0.2%In-Group Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Juan Vassallo: 0.4%Investigate Midwest: 1.1%Recency Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.8%Juan Vassallo: 0.3%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Appeal to Authority2.8%This article: 3.2%Juan Vassallo: 0.8%Investigate Midwest: 0.8%False Dilemma3.2%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.3%Juan Vassallo: 4.3%Investigate Midwest: 2.2%Hasty Generalization14.3%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.4%Juan Vassallo: 0.4%Investigate Midwest: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion4.4%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.5%Juan Vassallo: 0.7%Investigate Midwest: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.5%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.7%Juan Vassallo: 0.4%Investigate Midwest: 0.6%Composition/Division3.7%This article: 8.6%Juan Vassallo: 0.8%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Anecdotal8.6%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.5%Juan Vassallo: 1.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.5%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Juan Vassallo: 0.7%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Unattributed Quote3.6%This article: 3.6%Juan Vassallo: 0.7%Investigate Midwest: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection3.6%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Vassallo: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

617 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.