Eastbound I-70 reopens near Georgetown after vehicle fire 11%

By Lauren Penington18%

7/22/2026, 5:58:09 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (27,301 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the article peer group.

Eastbound Interstate 70 was closed near Georgetown for several hours Wednesday morning after a semitrailer caught fire, according to law enforcement. 
As of 9:20 a.m., eastbound I-70 had reopened between Exit 228 for Georgetown and U.S. 40, according to the Colorado Department of Transportation. 
The highway first closed at about 5:50 a.m. 
Wednesday. 
Photos posted by the Clear Creek County Sheriff’s Office showed a commercial semitrailer on fire early Wednesday morning. 
No injuries were reported, and the fire was knocked down by 6:15 a.m., sheriff’s officials said. 
The Colorado State Patrol is investigating the fire, Clear Creek sheriff’s officials said. 
This is a developing story and may be updated. 
Get more Colorado news by signing up for our daily Your Morning Dozen email newsletter. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 1.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 17.4%Lauren Penington: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Anchoring Bias17.4%This article: 13.6%Lauren Penington: 2.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.8%Availability Heuristic13.6%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 2.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 6.0%Baltimore Sun: 5.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Lauren Penington: 1.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.0%Recency Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.8%Lauren Penington: 5.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Appeal to Authority9.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 1.6%Baltimore Sun: 2.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Penington: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Lauren Penington: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.4%

132 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers53%attributed speech62writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words33% of attributed speech39% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -24.2 ptsWriter: 24.2%Colorado Department of Transportation: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.