Most of America’s beginning farmers don’t farm full time. 15%

By Mónica Cordero22% Investigate Midwest27%

7/20/2026, 10:04:30 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and False Dilemma, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 432 faulty-reasoning hits from 463 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (23,394 of 27,508 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the article peer group.

Beginning farmers are often described as the future of American agriculture. 
But the 2022 Census of Agriculture shows they are not simply younger versions of today’s farmers. 
Their age, work patterns and farm characteristics paint a more complicated picture of what it means to start farming in the United States today. 
USDA defines a beginning farmer or rancher as someone who has operated a farm or ranch for 10 years or less. 
The average age of a beginning farmer in the United States is 47.1 years old, more than a decade younger than the average U.S. farmer. 
Nearly one-quarter of beginning farmers are under 35, compared with fewer than one in 10 U.S. farmers overall. 
Beginning farmers are also far less likely to be 65 or older. 
Brooks Lamb, special adviser for strategic communications at American Farmland Trust, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting farmland and helping farmers gain access to land, said many beginning farmers enter agriculture later in life, often as a second career or retirement vocation, after building savings or financial security elsewhere. 
“People who are younger don’t have that economic security, so again it makes it even harder for them to get started,” he said. 
Women also make up a larger share of beginning producers than of producers overall. 
In 2022, women accounted for 41% of beginning producers, compared with 36% of all U.S. producers. 
Farms with at least one beginning producer sold $122 billion in agricultural products in 2022, accounting for 23% of all U.S. agricultural sales. 
Nearly half of those sales came from crops, while livestock, poultry and related products accounted for the rest. 
Yet the 2022 Census of Agriculture also suggests that beginning farmers are defined by more than their age. 
Nearly three-quarters (72%) reported a primary occupation other than farming, compared with 58% of all U.S. producers, and more than half worked off the farm for 200 days or more each year. 
The figures paint a picture of producers who often balance farming with other jobs as they establish their operations. 
Lamb said “affordable land access” may be the biggest barrier to entry. 
However, it is not the only challenge: beginning farmers still face “market pressures, the high cost of input prices and the inability to often control what price you sell your products at.” 
Data Harvest (formerly Graphic of the Week) is Investigate Midwest’s way of making complex agricultural data easy to understand. 
Through engaging graphics, charts, and maps, we break down key trends to help readers quickly grasp the forces shaping farming, food systems, and rural communities. 
Want us to explore other data trends? 
Let us know here. 
The post Most of America’s beginning farmers don’t farm full time. appeared first on Investigate Midwest . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.5%Mónica Cordero: 1.7%Investigate Midwest: 0.6%Confirmation Bias3.5%This article: 5.4%Mónica Cordero: 3.2%Investigate Midwest: 1.4%Anchoring Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 3.8%Investigate Midwest: 2.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 12.7%Mónica Cordero: 1.9%Investigate Midwest: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic12.7%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.2%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Mónica Cordero: 0.7%Investigate Midwest: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias2.6%This article: 3.5%Mónica Cordero: 3.0%Investigate Midwest: 3.9%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 1.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.1%Investigate Midwest: 0.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Mónica Cordero: 1.2%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Pessimism Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 6.4%Investigate Midwest: 8.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Mónica Cordero: 0.3%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.1%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 1.9%Investigate Midwest: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.5%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.8%Investigate Midwest: 0.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 6.9%Mónica Cordero: 1.2%Investigate Midwest: 0.6%False Dilemma6.9%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.5%Mónica Cordero: 1.5%Investigate Midwest: 2.4%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 4.3%Investigate Midwest: 1.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 3.9%Mónica Cordero: 0.3%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 5.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.8%Investigate Midwest: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.5%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.9%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.0%Mónica Cordero: 1.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Composition/Division5.0%This article: 4.1%Mónica Cordero: 0.3%Investigate Midwest: 0.6%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Mónica Cordero: 1.2%Investigate Midwest: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.3%Investigate Midwest: 0.4%Unattributed Quote5.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.8%Investigate Midwest: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 1.8%Investigate Midwest: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 1.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 2.1%Investigate Midwest: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mónica Cordero: 0.0%Investigate Midwest: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Mónica Cordero: 2.3%Investigate Midwest: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.9%

463 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker25%attributed speech348writer words
Selected voice

Brooks Lamb

100%flagged-word coverage
115 attributed words100% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote+20.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brooks Lamb: 20.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.8 ptsWriter: 15.8%Brooks Lamb: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.